The attachment of Apple products is an example of a recently controversial commercial link. When Apple released the iPhone on June 29, 2007,[10] it was sold exclusively with AT-T (formerly Cingular) contracts in the United States. [11] To force this exclusivity, Apple used some kind of software lock that made the phone not working on any network other than AT-Ts. [12] As part of the cooking concept, any user who tried to unlock or abuse the locking software risked rendering their iPhone permanently unusable. [12] This has caused complaints to many consumers because they were forced to pay an additional $175 for early termination if they wanted to safely unlock the device for use on another medium. [13] Other companies such as Google have complained that the link promotes wireless service with closed access. [13] [aborted verification] Many challenged the legality of the agreement[14] and, in October 2007, a class action was brought against Apple, claiming that its exclusive agreement with AT-T was contrary to California`s antitrust laws. [15] The complaint was filed by Damian R. Fernandez`s law firm on behalf of Timothy P. Smith, based in California,[15] and eventually attempted to sue Apple to prevent it from selling iPhones with any type of software blocking. [16] Banks have the right to take measures to protect their loans and guarantee the value of their investments, such as .B the requirement of guarantees or guarantees from borrowers. The law frees so-called “traditional banking” practices from its illegality, and is therefore aimed less at limiting banks` lending practices than at ensuring fair and competitive practice.

A large portion of the BHCA claims are dismissed. Banks still have some leeway to design credit contracts, but if a bank clearly crosses the limits of decency, the complainant is compensated with three damages. In accordance with C.C.I.`s order, an agreement of commitment is entered into when a seller, by a contractual or technological requirement, conditions the sale or lease of a product or service at the customer`s agreement to take over a second product or service in the order, C.C.I. acknowledges that the links are not contrary to the competition itself. , because “the economic literature indicates that there are pro-competitive reasons for product fixing. These include the benefits of assembly, improving quality and eliminating price inefficiencies. So it seems clear that C.C.I.